
SimpliGov |
October 5, 2026
The 7 workflows we see stalling state and local agencies most, with build tips for each: personnel actions, purchasing, ethics disclosures, IT access, and more.

In this article
Every government organization operates differently. On both the local and state level, each organization has its own structures, systems, and unique way of getting things done.
That said, after working with government agencies across the country, we consistently see the same workflows creating the same friction — regardless of agency type, size, or mission. They involve too many handoffs, too much manual coordination, and too much time spent tracking down approvals or chasing signatures.
The following seven workflows show up nearly everywhere and typically touch multiple departments. They're high-impact when automated, and they're all buildable in SimpliGov — without involving IT every time you need to make a change.
Let's dive in.
A single request for personnel action can require sign-off from a supervisor, a department head, HR, finance, and legal, often in a specific order, often with documentation attached at each step.
When this process runs on email threads and shared drives, requests stall. Approvers miss notifications. Someone submits the wrong form version. HR can't tell where a request is in the queue without making a phone call.
Automating the RPA workflow means every request moves through a defined path — with the right approvers notified at the right time, attachments collected automatically, and a clear audit trail from submission to completion. When the process runs reliably, agencies hire faster, catch pay discrepancies before they become equity issues, and spend less time on administrative back-and-forth with the people they're trying to retain.
When done manually, each step in the purchasing and procurement process is a potential delay. A request sits in someone's inbox over a long weekend. A budget code is entered incorrectly and the whole thing has to restart. No one can tell the requester where their order stands without digging through email.
An automated purchasing workflow keeps requests moving, routes them correctly the first time, and gives everyone involved — including the requester — visibility into where things stand. When purchasing moves faster, everything downstream moves faster too: projects don't stall waiting on approved vendors, service contracts don't lapse, and staff aren't spending time tracking down the status of their own requests.
Ethics disclosures are legally required, time-sensitive, and almost universally managed through paper forms and email. Employees submit disclosures to their supervisor, who forwards them to an ethics officer, who logs them somewhere, who follows up if something is missing. The process is prone to gaps — and in a compliance context, gaps create organizational risk.
Automating this workflow is less about efficiency and more about accuracy and reliability. Submissions get timestamped, reviews get documented, and overdue disclosures trigger automatic reminders. Nothing falls through the cracks because there are no cracks.
When someone joins an agency, transfers to a new role, or leaves, there's a cascade of IT tasks: provision accounts, assign permissions, issue or recover devices, update access across systems.
New employees wait days for access to the systems they need. Departing employees have accounts that stay active longer than they should. IT spends time on routine requests that could move on their own. Done manually, this process is slow, inconsistent, and a security risk.
An automated IT request workflow routes each request to the right person, tracks completion at each step, and creates a record of what was provisioned, when, and by whom. New employees get productive faster, departing employees don't leave open access behind them, and IT spends its time on work that actually requires technical expertise.
Government agencies manage a significant amount of physical inventory — vehicles, equipment, technology, furniture — and the records that support it are often scattered across spreadsheets, legacy systems, and institutional memory. When something needs to be repaired, transferred, or disposed of, the process involves a lot of manual coordination.
Automating asset management workflows doesn't replace your asset management system — it connects the processes around it. Checkout requests, maintenance requests, transfer approvals, and disposal authorizations all move through defined workflows with the right approvals, documentation, and notifications. The result is an asset record that stays current without anyone chasing assets or recreating the record after the fact.
Every agency has a category of work that requires executive sign-off — contracts, policies, communications, budget requests, strategic decisions.
Getting a request exec-ready takes coordination: the right documents attached, the right context included, the full record of how it got there. When something is missing, an executive has to chase it down before they can act — and whoever submitted the request often has no visibility into where it stands or what's holding it up.
An automated executive review workflow makes sure the right information is assembled and ready before anything lands in front of an executive — so when they get to it, they can act on it. The decisions driving critical projects move faster, the people waiting on them have visibility into where things stand, and the full record of the request is documented automatically.
What's constituent-facing looks very different across departments and agencies. A county might handle permit applications and inspection requests. A state agency might manage benefit enrollment and re-certification. A court might process case-related forms and requests for records.
What doesn't vary is the pattern: constituents submit something, it goes into a manual process, they wait, they call to check status, staff spend time answering the same questions, and the whole thing takes longer than it should.
Automating constituent-facing workflows means the constituent gets confirmation immediately, their submission moves through a defined process without anyone manually picking it up, and they're notified when something changes without having to call. For the agency, that means fewer inbound contacts, faster service delivery, and staff time freed up for work that actually requires a human.
Government processes aren't generic, and a workflow tool that only handles simple scenarios will show its limits fast. The right platform lets you configure each workflow to reflect your actual approval chains, routing logic, and terminology — and when something changes, the people who own the process can update it themselves, without writing code or opening an IT ticket.
When all of these workflows live in the same platform, you're not stitching together a separate tool for forms, another for signatures, and another for reporting. Information flows from one step to the next without someone manually moving it — and without the handoff gaps that come from systems that don't talk to each other. That said, role-based access means everyone sees what they need to do their job, and nothing they shouldn't, so shared data doesn't come at the cost of security.
All seven of these workflows are live in SimpliGov today, built by real government agencies and configured to their actual processes. Most agencies start with one or two, usually the ones causing the most friction or manual work, and expand from there. Tell us which process is causing the most friction. In a 30-minute session, we'll map its approval chain with you and show how it would run in SimpliGov. Map a workflow with us.
See how the workflows you're running by hand right now can run themselves.